<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for IT:  Interesting Things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smithsonlinks.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smithsonlinks.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:22:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Nemesis, the star? by Stewart MacLean</title>
		<link>http://smithsonlinks.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/nemesis-the-star/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart MacLean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smithsonlinks.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/nemesis-the-star/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Wow, didn&#039;t know about Nemesis before.
Thanks Josh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, didn&#8217;t know about Nemesis before.<br />
Thanks Josh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 6 Megapixels by cruxphoto</title>
		<link>http://smithsonlinks.wordpress.com/2007/12/26/6-megapixels/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>cruxphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smithsonlinks.wordpress.com/2007/12/26/6-megapixels/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I think you make a valid point, but some of your information is incorrect.  A 4 and a 10 Mpxl sensor will take the same amount of time to record each point of light.  The same shutter speed and aperture would be used for both.  The issue is that with a 10 Mpxl sensor that is the same size as the 4 Mpxl, each recording point on the sensor is very close to its neighbor, resulting in more noise because on recording point stimulates it&#039;s neighbor, rather than it being stimulated by actual light.  
http://www.photoxels.com/tutorial_noise.html
This is a great link that tells about noise and the causes.  And just as you said, higher Mpxl sensors that are the same size as lower ones are a big culprit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you make a valid point, but some of your information is incorrect.  A 4 and a 10 Mpxl sensor will take the same amount of time to record each point of light.  The same shutter speed and aperture would be used for both.  The issue is that with a 10 Mpxl sensor that is the same size as the 4 Mpxl, each recording point on the sensor is very close to its neighbor, resulting in more noise because on recording point stimulates it&#8217;s neighbor, rather than it being stimulated by actual light.<br />
<a href="http://www.photoxels.com/tutorial_noise.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoxels.com/tutorial_noise.html</a><br />
This is a great link that tells about noise and the causes.  And just as you said, higher Mpxl sensors that are the same size as lower ones are a big culprit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on about it by Mr WordPress</title>
		<link>http://smithsonlinks.wordpress.com/2007/12/24/hello-world/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 05:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1</guid>
		<description>Hi, this is a comment.&lt;br /&gt;To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts&#039; comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is a comment.<br />To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts&#8217; comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
